Evidence Hub

Research Progress and Suggestions on the Noise Equal Energy Hypothesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Yang Li, Lin Wu, Jinzhe Li, Haiying Liu, An-Ke Zeng, Jia-Rui Xin, Wei Qiu, Chang-Yan Yu et al.

Noise and Health, 2025

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the applicability and limitations of the equal energy hypothesis (EEH) in assessing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and investigate the role of the kurtosis parameter (reflecting noise temporal structure) in assessing NIHL, providing a basis for refining EEH theory. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to summarize studies related to EEH, systematically collecting its development, validation, and revision suggestions. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) of hearing loss caused by different types of noise were used to evaluate the role of noise kurtosis in the evaluation of NIHL. Results: A total of 57 articles were included, containing experimental and cross-sectional studies. Evidence showed significant limitations in the EEH when assessing non-steady noise, leading to an underestimation of NIHL under equal energy conditions. Animal experiments verified a critical level for assessing NIHL when using the EEH, with ranges of 90–135 dB in chinchillas and 108–120 dB in guinea pigs. EEH could be revised in the frequency domain (spectrum) and time domain (e.g., kurtosis). Meta-analysis showed that in animal experiments, WMD for permanent threshold shifts (PTSs) at 2, 4, and 8 kHz (PTS at 2, 4, and 8 kHz) was 3.30 dB (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.22–4.37); in population surveys, OR for high-frequency NIHL was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.36–2.32). Logistic regression analysis confirmed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free