Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of the value of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee

Qiao Lin, Jiwen Wu, Shijun Qiu

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2024

544 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Methods The literature search was performed up to December 8, 2023, and included a comprehensive examination of several databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Diagnostic metrics sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were determined using a bivariate model analysis. Heterogeneity within the data was explored through subgroup analyses, which considered variables including geographical region, use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), arthroscopy, and study design. Results The analysis included ten studies encompassing 544 patients. DECT demonstrated substantial diagnostic utility for ACL injuries of the knee, with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–0.94), a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81–0.95), a PLR of 9.20 (95% CI: 4.50–19.00), a NLR of 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06–0.14), a DOR of 97.00 (95% CI: 35.00–268.00), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97). The subgroup analyses consistently showed high diagnostic precision for ACL injuries across Asian population (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.91, PLR: 9.90, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 105.00, AUC: 0.96), in MRI subgroup…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 544 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free