Evidence Hub

Distinct metabolomic profiles in lean and non-lean polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome

Vagios S, Mermin-Bunnell A, Arkfeld CK, Sassin AM, James K, Souter I, Polli F, Pepin D

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026

4,768 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)/polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) is the most prevalent endocrine disorder in reproductive-age women and is characterized by long-term metabolic consequences. The purpose of this study is to delineate the metabolomic profile in lean and non-lean PMOS patients.

Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study includes 4768 premenopausal patients with available body mass index (BMI) and metabolomics information at the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Biobank. The Biobank includes samples collected from 05/2010 to 08/2023 with unique metabolomic biomarkers that encompass key metabolic pathways, including lipids, amino acids, and glycolysis-related metabolites. The main outcome measures were metabolomic profile differences between PMOS (n = 403) and non-PMOS patients (n = 4365). Sub-analyses were performed within normal BMI (2), overweight BMI (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity BMI (≥ 30 kg/m2) subgroups.

Results: PMOS patients were younger (p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (p < 0.001). When considering the total population and adjusting for age, BMI, exercise, metformin, oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, PMOS affected the expression of only 1/71 (1.4%) parameter compared to the non-PMOS group. In the normal BMI sub-group, there were no differences in any of the metabolomic parameters when controlling for age, exercise, metformin, OCPs, and GLP-1 agonists except for creatinine levels that were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 4,768 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free