Evidence Hub

Polycystic ovary syndrome and its association with reproductive cancers in women

Alur-Gupta S, DiTosto JD, Busse KR, Liu Q, Blackman AM, Brensinger C, Mumford SL, Dokras A

Fertility and sterility, 2026

2,113,065 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at an increased risk of female reproductive cancers.

Design: A retrospective cohort study was performed using Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2000-2022).

Subjects: Females aged 18-50 with no prior reproductive cancer history.

Exposure: Individuals with PCOS, identified through ICD9/10 codes for PCOS and codes for both hirsutism and irregular menses, were matched 1:5 by age and diagnosis month with women without PCOS.

Main outcome measures: The outcomes were incident female reproductive cancers, specifically: breast, uterine, ovarian/fallopian tube, and cervical. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) were used to control for confounding by race/ethnicity, education, and history of obesity, smoking, infertility, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hormonal contraception use. The adjusted hazard (HR) of each outcome was calculated using doubly robust IPT-weighted Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the variables in the IPTW models plus hereditary cancer syndrome. Censoring was performed at the time of diagnosis, date of surgery for the affected organ (e.g., date of hysterectomy for uterine cancer outcome), or end of time in Optum Clinformatics, as appropriate. Sensitivity analyses additionally controlled for medications used to treat medical comorbidities, including metformin, antihypertensives, and statins.

Results: A total of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,113,065 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free