Evidence Hub

The Efficacy of 24-Month Metformin for Improving Menses, Hormones, and Metabolic Profiles in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Po-Kai Yang, Chih-Yuan Hsu, Mei-Jou Chen, M. Lai, Zheng-Rong Li, Chen-Hsin Chen, Shee-Uan Chen, H. Ho

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2018

40 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: The long-term effects of metformin in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) are inadequately studied.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of metformin on women with PCOS during 24 months with respect to menses, hormones, and metabolic profiles are assessed.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort.

SETTING: A reproductive endocrinology clinic in a university-affiliated medical center.

PATIENTS: One hundred nineteen women with PCOS, defined by the Rotterdam criteria, were enrolled.

INTERVENTION: Metformin was given daily for 24 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with regular menstruation during treatment. Changes in anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic parameters were also assessed. Analyses were performed using segmented regression analysis with a generalized estimating equation methodology. Outcomes are expressed as magnitude of change from the baseline.

RESULTS: Both overweight (OW) and normal-weight (NW) women with PCOS had increased menstrual frequency and decreased body mass index (BMI), testosterone, and luteinizing hormone levels in the first 6 months. Further stratification showed that NW women exhibiting elevated testosterone at baseline had the largest magnitude of improvement at 6 months [odds ratio (OR), 7.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.35 to 22.17], whereas OW patients with normal testosterone were most likely to achieve normal menses at 12 months (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS: Metformin was associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free