Evidence Hub

Effects of acarbose on polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis

Zhang YY, Hou LQ, Zhao TY

Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2014

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Whether or not acarbose benefits patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to synthesize the literature regarding the therapeutic effects of acarbose on PCOS.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using terms, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, ovary polycystic disease, PCOS, hyperandrogenemia, acarbose, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in the following bibliographic databases: Medline; Embase; and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The identified reference lists were checked manually.

RESULTS: 6 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Based on the meta-analysis of 3 studies, acarbose was superior to placebo or no treatment in reducing serum levels of testosterone (Std MD = - 3.38, 95% CI:-5.97~-0.78, P = 0.01) and acarbose caused a significantly higher incidence of side effects, such as abdominal distention and diarrhea (OR = 23.78, 95% CI: 5.67~99.75, P < 0.0001). The changes in Ferriman-Gallwey score or body mass index (BMI) were not significant. Based on the meta-analysis of 2 studies, acarbose were superior to placebo or no treatment in reducing triglycerides (TG; WMD = -18.18, 95% CI:-36.30~-0.06, P = 0.05) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (WMD = - 6.49, 95% CI:-9.14~-3.84, P < 0.00001), and increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (WMD = 5.14, 95% CI:1.73~8.55, P = 0.003). There were no significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free