Evidence Hub

Prevalence and associated factors of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuan Y, Hu L, Li Y, Hou X

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

5,507 participants

Abstract

Objective: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common endocrine disorder in reproductive-aged women, often leads to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to systematically evaluate GDM prevalence and its associated factors in PCOS.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, Sinomed, and VIP from inception to December 31, 2025. Studies reporting GDM prevalence or associated factors in PCOS were included. A random-effects model pooled prevalence with odds ratios. Egger's test assessed publication bias, and subgroup analysis with meta-regression explored heterogeneity. A logit transformation was applied for pooling.

Results: Twenty-two studies with 5,507 PCOS patients were included. The pooled GDM prevalence was 24% (95% CI: 20%-28%; prediction interval: 10%-46%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 89.9%). The primary prevalence estimate, based on cohort studies (n=13), was 21.7% (95% CI: 17.7%-25.8%), while the overall estimate including case-control studies was 24% (95% CI: 20%-28%). By diagnostic criteria, GDM prevalence was 26.0% for one-step vs. 18.7% for two-step. Potentially associated factors included pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 1.39), gestational weight gain (OR = 1.58), HOMA-IR (OR = 3.41), and family history of diabetes (OR = 2.88).

Conclusion: Although the pooled GDM prevalence in PCOS was 24%, substantial heterogeneity and a wide prediction interval (10%-46%) suggest the true prevalence varies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,507 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free