Evidence Hub

The effectiveness of digital health interventions on anthropometric and healthy behavior in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Zeng HF, Dou Z, Zhang YN, Wang CC, Xia T, Xu J

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

930 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of digital health interventions (DHIs) for improving anthropometric and healthy behavior in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

Methods: Five databases were searched from their inception to April 2025 with no date restrictions. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results: Ten trials with 930 participants were included. In short-term (≤3 months), DHIs yielded significant reductions in BMI (MD -1.19; -1.84 to -0.55; I²=0%), waist circumference (MD -2.14; -3.11 to -1.17; I²=0%) and large improvements in total HPLP-II score (SMD 1.61; 1.20 to 2.01; I²=0%), physical activity (SMD 1.43; 1.04 to 1.83; I²=0%), health responsibility (SMD 1.02; 0.64 to 1.39; I²=0%), interpersonal relationships (SMD 0.96; 0.59 to 1.33; I²=0%), spiritual growth (SMD 1.25; 0.87 to 1.64; I²=0%) and stress management (SMD 1.17; 0.79 to 1.55; I²=0%); there was no significant change in body weight (SMD -0.04; -0.23 to 0.15; I²=0%) or HPLP-II nutrition (SMD 0.83; -0.11 to 1.78; I²=84%). In medium-term (3-6 months), DHIs continued to reduce BMI (MD -2.46; -3.04 to -1.88; I²=22%) and waist circumference (MD -4.65; -6.70 to -2.60; I²=0%), and yielded significant improvements in depressive symptoms (SMD -0.85; -1.17 to -0.53; I²=17%) and anxiety (SMD -0.95; -1.33 to -0.56; I²=42%).

Conclusion:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 930 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free