Evidence Hub

Effects of physical activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cavalcante DCB, Scandolara TB, Kogure GS, Rodrigues C, Verruma CG, de Moraes MO, Dos Reis RM, Cavalcante MB et al.

Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025

382 participants

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on body mass index (BMI), insulin levels, lipid profiles, and hormonal parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for publications up to September 2024. Fully published articles involving reproductive-age women diagnosed with PCOS were included.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials comparing supervised aerobic or resistance exercise to no intervention in women diagnosed with PCOS based on Rotterdam or NIH criteria were included. The Rayyan Systematic Review tool was used to organize study data.

Data collection: Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis employed random-effects modeling.

Data synthesis: Ten randomized controlled trials with 382 women were analyzed. Aerobic exercise interventions (12-24 weeks) reduced BMI, waist circumference, insulin levels, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein. Effects on fasting glucose, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides varied. Hormonal assessments showed reduced testosterone and increased sex hormone-binding globulin in some studies. Resistance exercise improved lean body mass and reduced body fat percentage but showed minimal effects on hormonal parameters. Meta-analysis revealed aerobic exercise decreased insulin, cholesterol, and triglycerides compared to no intervention, while other metabolic and hormonal markers showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 382 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free