Evidence Hub

Prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in polycystic ovary syndrome and its impact on insulin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shekarian A, Mazaheri-Tehrani S, Shekarian S, Pourbazargan M, Setudeh M, Abhari AP, Fakhrolmobasheri M, Heidarpour M

BMC endocrine disorders, 2025

5,765 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Background: Although recent studies indicate a high prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the reported prevalence rates vary widely. Therefore, we conducted this study to estimate the pooled prevalence of SCH among women with PCOS. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that SCH may negatively impact insulin resistance in PCOS. Thus, we examined its effect on insulin resistance indices as our secondary objective.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase from their inception to February 25, 2024. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of SCH among women with PCOS were included. Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for prevalence studies was adopted for the risk of bias assessment. The random-effects model was employed to estimate the pooled prevalence with its 95% confidence intervals (CI). The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to compare the insulin resistance indices between PCOS patients with and without SCH.

Results: Twenty-nine studies comprising 5765 women with PCOS were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that 19.7% (95% CI: 16.1%; 23.5%) of women with PCOS have SCH. PCOS patients with SCH had significantly higher HOMA-IR (WMD = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.34; 1.22) and fasting insulin (WMD = 2.38, 95% CI: 0.34; 4.42) levels than those without SCH. Differences in fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour postprandial glucose did not reach statistical significance.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,765 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free