Evidence Hub

The effectiveness of nutritional supplements in improving polycystic ovary syndrome in women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Zhao G, Fan Y, Li R, Huang Y, Li W, Zhao Y, Zhou M, He J

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025

5,501 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Nutritional supplements are known to ameliorate polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and have been shown to modulate endocrine and metabolic markers, oxidative stress markers and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with PCOS. A variety of nutritional supplements have been applied in clinics, but a more comprehensive ranking of their efficacy has not yet been investigated.

Objectives: To assess the comparative effectiveness of nutritional supplements in women with PCOS.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria up to October 12, 2023. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the effectiveness of various nutritional supplements on different indicators of PCOS by synthesizing both direct and indirect evidence from the trials.

Results: Seventy-nine RCTs involving 5,501 participants were enrolled in the NMA. It suggested that chromium was notably effective in improving follicle-stimulating hormone levels, total antioxidant capacity, and very low-density lipoprotein levels. Soy isoflavones were more beneficial for enhancing glutathione levels and reducing malondialdehyde levels. Inositol significantly decreased total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, while curcumin was most effective in improving low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Additionally, Omega-3 was superior in reducing homeostatic model…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,501 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free