Evidence Hub

From Static Structures to Molecular Dynamics: Emerging Directions in X-Ray and Electron Materials Characterization

Sasaki D, Mio K, Sasaki YC

Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Structural analysis using X-rays and electron beams has long provided the average arrangement of atoms and molecules-that is, "structural information"-with high precision. By contrast, static measurements cannot directly yield dynamic information on how a material changes over time; instead, information on motion is convolved into a single numerical value such as the B-factor (atomic displacement parameter). Taking this limitation as its starting point, this review surveys the recent trend of introducing a time axis into measurements to observe material dynamics directly. First, we outline the technological foundations that have made the transition from static to time-resolved measurement possible. It rests on the dramatic shortening of exposure times, enabled by the increased brilliance of X-ray and electron sources and by advances in detection technology such as direct photon-counting detectors. Next, we survey dynamic measurement techniques, including time-resolved X-ray crystallography, coherent X-ray scattering, neutron scattering, and time-resolved electron microscopy. We also point out the essential limitation that most of them still return ensemble or volume averages. Building on this, we systematically describe diffracted X-ray tracking (DXT), diffracted X-ray blinking (DXB), small-angle X-ray blinking (SAXB), transmitted X-ray blinking (TXB), and electron-beam molecular dynamics (EBMD), which use gold nanocrystals and gold nanoparticles as motion probes. We…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free