Protocols for instrumental memory reconsolidation in rodents: A methodological review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Memory reconsolidation enables the update of a previously consolidated memory trace after its reactivation. Although Pavlovian memory reconsolidation has been widely demonstrated, instrumental memory reconsolidation is still debated. Early studies suggested that instrumental memories did not undergo reconsolidation and therefore could not be disrupted, whereas other authors suggested that these memories are just more resistant to destabilization and reconsolidation in comparison to Pavlovian memories.
AIM AND RESULTS: The present paper reviews the behavioral protocols used to investigate appetitive instrumental memory reconsolidation in rodents and describes in detail the specific methods used for memory retrieval, with a critical analysis of the different experimental parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The modalities under which the reconsolidation of appetitive (sucrose or drugs of abuse) instrumental memories occurs have been explored and partially elucidated. Further investigations are recommended on the boundary conditions that constrain instrumental memory reactivation.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.