Age-related differences in episodic memory precision are robust across time of day, chronotype, and testing format
Abstract
Older adults typically exhibit reduced episodic memory precision, while maintaining relatively preserved retrieval success. However, little is known about whether these age-related differences are influenced by internal biological factors (e.g., chronotype) or external testing conditions (e.g., experiment format, time of day). To address this question, younger and older adults completed an object-location memory task online, either in the morning or evening, and either with or without video-based supervision. Memory performance was assessed using mean absolute error and Bayesian hierarchical mixture modelling, which dissociated memory precision (κ1) from the probability of memory-based responding (θ1). Immediate memory performance was high across age groups, irrespective of time of day. Greater encoding error predicted greater retrieval error, and participants tested in the video condition exhibited lower recall error and higher recognition performance than those tested without supervision. Consistent with prior studies, older adults exhibited reduced memory precision relative to younger adults, whereas retrieval success remained largely intact. However, Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling provided no evidence that time of day, experiment format, or their interactions with age influenced either memory precision or retrieval probability. Older adults reported stronger morning preferences than younger adults, and participants generally selected testing times that aligned with…
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.