Episodic memory adaptively expands retrieval through typicality-guided transformation while concrete details remain accessible
Abstract
Memory faces a fundamental challenge. It has to become flexible enough to be accessed by novel cues without losing the specific information that defines each individual episode. Whether memory transformation solves this problem by sacrificing details or by adaptively expanding retrieval while preserving them is unclear. We tested this by manipulating the match between a memory and its retrieval cue. Participants retrieved object associations after 6, 24 and 48 hours using either the original encoded image or novel exemplars that were more typical or more distinctive of the same object category. Retrieval initially benefited from the originally encoded image, but this advantage was reduced across delay. By 48 hours, a never-seen, more typical exemplar triggered retrieval as effectively as the original one, while the same convergence was not evident for less-typical exemplars. Crucially, such cue expansion was not accompanied by a loss of perceptual specificity. Participants retained access to the originally encoded exemplar across delays, while errors increasingly favoured more typical alternatives. At the item level, stronger episodic memories predicted better access to perceptual detail, but did not predict the tendency of errors for category-like information, which instead increased with delay. This dissociation suggests that memory generalisation and the continued accessibility of visual detail reflect partly separable transformations rather than opposite ends of a single…
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.