Different hippocampal subfield volumes predict source memory performance and general cognitive ability in an adult lifespan sample
Abstract
Modest positive associations between episodic memory performance and whole hippocampal and hippocampal subfield volumes have been reported in numerous prior studies. A smaller number of studies have reported associations between hippocampal volume and performance on tests of non-mnemonic cognition. The present study examined whether these associations were evident in a lifespan sample of cognitively healthy adults. Of particular interest was whether any identified associations were sensitive to age, and whether associations between subfield volumes and mnemonic and non-mnemonic performance were subfield dependent. We acquired high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted structural images from 163 adults (18-87 years of age). Participants also undertook a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and an in-scanner test of source memory. Principal components analysis was employed to reduce the neuropsychological test scores to 5 cognitive components. Two components reflected memory performance while the other three reflected different aspects of non-mnemonic cognition. Hippocampal subfields (Cornu Ammonis (CA)1, CA2-3, dentate gyrus (DG) and subiculum) were segmented and measured with the Automated Segmentation of Hippocampus Subfields (ASHS) package. Source memory performance was selectively associated across participants with CA2-3 volume. By contrast, both mnemonic and non-mnemonic component scores derived from the test battery were associated exclusively with the volume of the…
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.