Evidence Hub

Interplay of Anticipatory Curiosity and Reactive Surprise drive epistemic motivation and lasting memory updating

Poh J, Hsiung A, Sevchik P, Syed R, Huettel SA, Adcock RA

2026

Abstract

The need to correct erroneous beliefs is inevitable, especially in a world where information propagates faster than it can be verified. However, passive exposure to corrections is often inadequate for memory updating. Prospective motivational states like curiosity and error-evoked signals like surprise have each been shown to motivate learning and influence memory, yet how they interact to shape information-seeking and memory updating remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that anticipatory curiosity and post-error surprise serve as distinct, compensatory drivers of epistemic motivation and memory updating. Using a paradigm designed to evoke high-confidence errors, we assessed curiosity, surprise, information seeking, and memory updating in participants who were tested either immediately or after a 24-hour delay. We found that while memory updating tested after 24 hours was weaker (relative to immediate testing), active information-seeking protected updated memories from decay. Crucially, when initial curiosity was low, post-error surprise acted as a compensatory trigger to increase information-seeking and durable memory updating. Mediation analyses showed that error-evoked epistemic signals enhanced durable memory updating both directly and indirectly by promoting information-seeking decisions. These findings highlight that when curiosity is lacking, evoking salient errors can promote both active information-seeking and durable memory updating necessary for correcting…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free