Evidence Hub

HIV–Tuberculosis Coinfection Reshapes CD4⁺ T-Cell Differentiation Trajectories and Associates with Adrenal Hormonal Imbalance

Vecchione MB, Angerami MT, Sued O, Laufer N, Quiroga MF

2026

88 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background: HIV–tuberculosis (TB) co-infection is associated with profound immune dysregulation, but how it affects CD4 + T-cell differentiation and its relationship with adrenal hormonal imbalance remains incompletely understood. We characterized naïve and effector/memory CD4 + T-cell profiles across the spectrum of HIV-associated TB and investigated the differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb )-responsive CD4 + T cells and their modulation by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in vitro . Results: In this cross-sectional study, 88 individuals were classified as HIV-TB, HIV-TB with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, HIV with latent TB, HIV without TB, or healthy donors. HIV-TB and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome showed a marked redistribution of the CD4 + T-cell compartment, characterized by reduced naïve and increased effector-memory cells, together with lower naïve-to-effector-memory ratios. Preservation of the naïve compartment was positively associated with CD4 + T-cell counts, CD4/CD8 ratio, and adrenal hormone parameters, whereas central memory cells showed associations with DHEA and cortisol/DHEA ratios. Mtb -responsive CD4 + T cells from HIV-TB individuals showed reduced central memory and increased terminally differentiated effector-memory cells compared with total CD4 + T cells, whereas healthy donors displayed a broader differentiation shift following Mtb stimulation. Correlation analyses revealed distinct differentiation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 88 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free