Evidence Hub

Transcranial Random Aperiodic Stimulation Improves Working Memory Precision

van Engen Q, Riddle J, Voytek B

2026

30 participants

Abstract

Aperiodic neural activity – historically dismissed as noise – is independently modulated from neural oscillations during visual working memory maintenance. In the context of aging, “flatter” trait aperiodic activity is associated with poorer visual working memory performance. Here, we causally test the role of aperiodic neural activity in visual working memory in younger adults. We introduce a novel noninvasive neurostimulation method – transcranial random aperiodic stimulation (tRAS) – to causally manipulate aperiodic activity to be either steeper or flatter. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover neurostimulation design (n = 30), we show that online noninvasive tRAS improves visual working memory precision when aperiodic activity is causally steepened. Our novel stimulation method paves the way for causal studies of non-oscillatory, aperiodic activity in human cognition, aging, and disease.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free