Mechanisms of Cognitive Change
Abstract
This study will determine whether targeted cognitive training, a low-cost and low-risk commercial cognitive remediation therapy, directly impacts therapeutic targets as well as secondary outcomes in college undergraduates. The active intervention will be compared to an active control condition (computer games). Participants will also attend CSU TILT (The Institute for Teaching and Learning) Academic Workshops.
Conditions: Psychosis.
Primary outcome: MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Verbal Learning Subscale Scores.
Enrollment: 40 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 40 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.