A Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroQ on Cognitive Function in Healthy Adults with Self-reported Memory Problems
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of NeuroQ on cognitive function in a North American population of healthy adults with self-reported memory problems compared to placebo. The difference in change in cognitive function as assessed by the CNS Vital Signs (CNS VS) Neurocognitive Index (NCI) score between NeuroQ and placebo will be measured from baseline at Day 60. Additionally, the safety and tolerability of NeuroQ, as compared to placebo, will be measured by the occurrence of and/or changes in treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Participants will take two capsules containing NeuroQ or placebo once a day for 60 days, have 4 in-person clinic visits, and keep a diary of their symptoms and number of missed doses.
Conditions: Healthy, Self-reported Memory Problems.
Primary outcome: The difference in change in cognitive function between NeuroQ and placebo..
Enrollment: 40 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.