Evidence Hub

Validation of Sleep Assessment Tools in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Comparison of Thai Version of Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, Actigraphy, and Polysomnography

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2021

55 participants

Abstract

Sleep deprivation is common in critical patients and it can cause impair consolidation of memory, cognitive function, metabolic function, immune, neurological and respiratory system as well as worsen the quality of life after discharge. It has been demonstrated that reducing sleep disturbance could attenuate the development of delirium in ICU patients. However, sleep evaluation is only personal perception. There are various methods for sleep monitoring, in which the most commonly mentioned methods include polysomnography, actigraphy, and the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). The aims of this study is to validate the accuracy of the Thai-version RCSQ and actigraphy for sleep measurement compared to polysomnography, which is considered as the gold-standard in Thai critically ill patients admitted to surgical intensive care unit.

Conditions: Sleep, Sleep Disturbance, Sleep Deprivation, Polysomnography, Surveys and Questionnaires, Intensive Care Unit, Adult.

Primary outcome: Total sleep time measured using polosomnography; Total sleep time measured using wrist actigraphy; Sleep measurement using Thai-version Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire.

Enrollment: 55 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 55 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free