A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Anodal Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation (tDCS) Against Cathodal and Sham Stimulation in Adults With High-Functioning Autism
Abstract
This study will involve an experiment in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) comparing their performance on a working memory task before, during and after non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) compared to a control group in a 3x3 factorial design. How the stimulation affects performance on the task will be assessed, along with the impact of the intervention on the individuals.
Conditions: Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Primary outcome: Working memory accuracy score compared to typically developed controls scores..
Enrollment: 50 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 50 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.