Evidence Hub

Motor Plasticity Enhancement of Spaced iTBS Trains: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Trial of D-cycloserine

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2022

20 participants

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a modality for probing and altering brain function in humans non-invasively. The technology relies on the principles of electromagnetic induction, whereby magnetic fields have an associated electrical field. By intersecting two magnetic fields safely generated outside the head, one can induce a focal electrical current where the magnetic fields intersect in the brain, and this can depolarize cell membranes and impact brain activity.

A well investigated phenomenon in neuroscience is the principle of long term potentiation (LTP), and its converse long term depression (LTD), referring to the ability of neurons to increase or decrease their connection strength in an activity dependent manner. They do this through modifications to their electrochemical junctions, the synapses. We have previously used the motor system as a model system to study the impact D-Cycloserine, an NMDA receptor partial agonist, on synaptic plasticity after TMS.

Conventional therapeutic TMS is delivered once daily, however it is increasingly being delivered multiple times per day in an effort to speed treatment effects. It is unclear how adjunctive agents would impact these repeated stimulation designs.

Research Question:

Does the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor partial agonist D-Cycloserine stabilize motor plasticity across multiple daily sessions of TMS?

Conditions: Motor Activity.

Primary outcome: Stimulus Response Curve (SRC): Change in stability…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free