Efficacy of Paper-based Cognitive Training in Vietnamese Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of paper-based cognitive training in Vietnamese patients with early Alzheimer's disease
Conditions: Alzheimer Disease.
Primary outcome: Change from baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); Change from baseline in the Memory tests; Change from baseline in the Trail Making test scores; Change from baseline in the Digits Span forward and backward; Change from baseline in the Verbal fluency test; Change from baseline in the Clock drawing test; Change from baseline in the 15-Item Version of the Boston Naming Test; Change from baseline in the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score..
Enrollment: 70 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 70 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Diarylethenes for Memories and Switches
- Long-Term Potentiation and Memory
- Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
- Memory aging and brain maintenance
- Effector and Memory CTL Differentiation
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.