Evidence Hub

Could Subjective Cognitive Complaints Give the Facts of Objective Cognitive Impairments in Non-Central Nervous System Cancer? A Systematic Review

Li CN, Guo NW, Su BY

Brain and behavior, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancer patients experienced cognitive impairment, both subjectively and objectively. However, they are only weakly correlated. Previous studies indicated that subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) could be a distinct neural phenotype from objective neuropsychological function. To explore what underlies SCCs, we examined the relationship between SCCs and objective neuropsychological assessment in this systematic review.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched multiple databases from September 2000 to November 2024 for cross-sectional studies that directly investigated SCCs and neuropsychological assessment, excluding those involving neurological conditions. Sixteen of the 202 articles met the criteria; the total sample included 2093. We used multilevel meta-analysis in R to analyze 156 correlation coefficients and estimated the sampling error variance, within-study variance, and between-study variance from the analysis.

Results: The correlations between SCCs and objective neuropsychological examinations were low but significant. When using cognitive domains, female ratio, and age disparity as variables, 57.18% of the variance was attributed to within-study variance. As the female ratio increased, correlations between SCCs and executive function were inconsistent but consistent with attention and memory. When considering the relationship with age disparity, the trend would be corrected.

Conclusions: Different…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free