Evidence Hub

Experimental evaluation of the GE NM/CT 870 CZT clinical SPECT system equipped with WEHR and MEHRS collimator

Ito T, Matsusaka Y, Onoguchi M, Ichikawa H, Okuda K, Shibutani T, Shishido M, Sato K

Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021

Abstract

PURPOSE: A high-energy-resolution whole-body SPECT-CT device (NM/CT 870 CZT; C-SPECT) equipped with a CZT detector has been developed and is being used clinically. A MEHRS collimator has also been developed recently, with an expected improvement in imaging accuracy using medium-energy radionuclides. The objective of this study was to compare and analyze the accuracies of the following devices: a WEHR collimator and the MEHRS collimator installed on a C-SPECT, and a NaI scintillation detector-equipped Anger-type SPECT (A-SPECT) scanner, with a LEHR and LMEGP.

METHODS: A line phantom was used to measure the energy resolutions including collimator characteristics in the planar acquisition of each device using 99m Tc and 123 I. We also measured the system's sensitivity and high-contrast resolution using a lead bar phantom. We evaluated SPECT spatial resolution, high-contrast resolution, radioactivity concentration linearity, and homogeneity, using a basic performance evaluation phantom. In addition, the effect of scatter correction was evaluated by varying the sub window (SW) employed for scattering correction.

RESULTS: The energy resolution with 99m Tc was 5.6% in C-SPECT with WEHR and 9.9% in A-SPECT with LEHR. Using 123I, the results were 9.1% in C-SPECT with WEHR, 5.5% in C-SPECT with MEHRS, and 10.4% in A-SPECT with LMEGP. The planar spatial resolution was similar under all conditions, but C-SPECT performed better in SPECT acquisition. High-contrast resolution was improved…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free