Evidence Hub

Improved X-ray absorption capability of Core-shell nano-transducer in situ enhances γ-ray-excited radioluminescence imaging in vivo

Guo R, Cao T, Yang S, Liu H, Guo Q, Lan X, An R, Engle JW et al.

Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Radioluminescence imaging (RLI) using nanoscintillators offers great potential for biomedical applications, yet remains constrained by low quantum efficiency and the reliance of Cerenkov imaging on high-energy radionuclides. The rational design of core-shell nano-transducers overcomes these constraints by enhancing X-ray absorption and energy confinement, thereby enabling efficient γ-ray excited radioluminescence.

Results: We engineered NaGdF₄:15%Eu@NaLuF₄ core-shell nanoparticles as a superior nano-scintillator, designed to leverage Technetium-99m (99mTc) as an ideal excitation source. The key advantage of our system lies in its ability to efficiently convert the low-energy electron emissions from 99mTc into intense radioluminescence, completely bypassing the Cerenkov threshold and thus overcoming the key limitations of Cerenkov radiation. The optimized core-shell structure exhibited a radioluminescence intensity slope (k1) of 10.9 × 104 (p/s/cm2/sr)/MBq under 99mTc excitation, representing a 110% enhancement over the core-only nanoparticles. This enhanced scintillation output was paired with a remarkable CT contrast slope (k₂) of 47.6 HU/(mg/mL), demonstrating superior X-ray absorption capability. Capitalizing on these attributes, when integrated with 99mTc-sulfur colloid, this platform enabled background-free, multimodal SPECT/CT/RLI for high-contrast sentinel lymph node mapping and precise image-guided resection in murine models, the success of which was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free