Evidence Hub

The effect of functional electrical stimulation of the legs on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rui Zeng, Jun Chen, Yimin Wang, Qiang Liu

SAGE Open Medicine, 2024

732 participants · 22,849 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Functional electrical stimulation is important for the rehabilitation of patients with chronic heart failure. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation versus conventional exercise training or placebo in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods: Studies were searched through PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases up to 1 November 2023. The outcomes were cardiopulmonary function index (6-minute walking distance), peak oxygen consumption, and Minnesota Heart Failure Life Questionnaire quality of life scores. A subgroup analysis was conducted according to the ejection fraction. The 95% confidence interval and mean difference represented the outcome of the effect size. Results: Seventeen studies involving 732 participants were included. Compared with the control, functional electrical stimulation significantly improved peak oxygen consumption (MD = 2.84 ml/kg/min, 95% Cl: 1.99–3.68 ml/kg/min), increased 6-minute walking distance (MD = 49.52 m, 95% Cl: 22.61–76.43 m), and improved the life quality scores (MD = −12.86, 95% Cl: −17.48 to −7.88). Compared with functional electrical stimulation, exercise training also improved peak oxygen consumption (MD = −0.94 ml/kg/min−1, 95% Cl: −1.36 to −0.52 ml/kg/min), and the quality of life (QoL, MD = 0.66, 95% Cl: 0.34–0.98, p < 0.05, I2 = 38%), but the result of 6-minute walking distance (MD = −6.97 m, 95% Cl: −18.32 to −4.38 m) did not show a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 732 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free