Evidence Hub

Climate change in the workforce: A systematic review of knowledge, attitudes and practices among vulnerable workers categories

Farina S, Sabatelli A, Di Pumpo M, Ricciardi W, Gualano MR

Public health, 2026

Abstract

Objectives: To map the existing literature on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding climate change among workers vulnerable to climate-related occupational risks.

Study design: Systematic review of cross-sectional studies.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of survey-based cross-sectional studies. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 2000 and December 2025. Eligible studies reported measurable outcomes for at least one KAP component related to climate change. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. KAP patterns were analyzed according to occupational sectors, geographic regions, and worker characteristics.

Results: Among 2126 records, we included 19 studies, covering a sample of 10,000 workers, mainly engaged in agriculture. Most studies reported high awareness of climate variability (84.2%) and perceived vulnerability (78.9%), while adoption of at least one adaptive practice was observed in 68.4% of articles. A knowledge-practice gap emerged in one-quarter of the evidence. Adaptation among farmers included agronomic and livestock management strategies, often influenced by access to education and resources. In contrast, surveys on construction and informal workers reported more limited knowledge of heat-related health risks and reliance on individual coping behaviors, with few employer-led protective measures.

Conclusion:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free