Evidence Hub

Reevaluating aminosalicylates role in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis in the era of biologics

T. Mudege, J. Soldera

World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2025

9,967 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) has been a cornerstone treatment for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), traditionally used to maintain remission. With the rise of advanced therapies (biologics and small molecules), the role of 5-ASA has come under renewed scrutiny. While earlier systematic reviews affirmed its efficacy compared to placebo, these did not account for the advent of advanced therapies.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of oral 5-ASA in maintaining remission in quiescent UC, compared to placebo, alternative 5-ASA formulations, and advanced therapies, in the era of biologics and small molecules.

METHODS

It was systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, alongside conference proceedings (European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation, British Society of Gastroenterology), for randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2024 in English. Eligible studies involved oral 5-ASA therapies for quiescent UC with a minimum treatment duration of six months. Outcomes included failure to maintain remission, adverse events, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Data were analyzed using Cochrane methods, with GRADE assessing evidence certainty.

RESULTS

From 44 studies (9967 participants), 5-ASA was superior to placebo in maintaining remission, with 37% of 5-ASA users relapsing at 6-12 months compared to 55% of placebo users [risk ratios (RR): 0.68; 95%CI: 0.61-0.76; high-certainty evidence]. SAEs were rare and comparable between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,967 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free