Evidence Hub

Target product profiles for digital health technologies including those with artificial intelligence: a systematic review

Trystan Macdonald, Henry David Jeffry Hogg, Jacqueline Dinnes, Lucy Verrinder, Gregory Maniatopoulos, Sian Taylor‐Phillips, Bethany Shinkins, John Kevin Dunbar et al.

Frontiers in Health Services, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Digital health technologies (DHTs), including those incorporating artificial intelligence (AI), have the potential to improve healthcare access, efficiency, and quality, reducing gaps between healthcare capacity and demand. Despite prioritisation in health policy, the adoption of DHTs remains limited, especially for AI, in part due to complex system requirements. Target product profiles (TPPs) are documents outlining the characteristics necessary for medical technologies to be utilised in practice and offer a way to align DHTs’ research and development with health systems’ needs. This systematic review examines current DHT TPPs’ methodologies, stakeholders, and contents. A total of 14 TPPs were identified, most targeted at low- and middle-income settings and communicable diseases. Only one TPP outlined the requirements for an AI device specifically. In total, 248 different characteristics were reported across the TPPs identified and were consolidated down to 33 key characteristics. Some considerations for DHTs’ successful adoption, such as regulatory requirements or environmental sustainability, were reported inconsistently or not at all. There was little standardisation in TPP development or contents, and limited transparency in reporting. Our findings emphasise the need for guidelines for TPP development, could help inform these, and could be used as a basis to develop future DHT TPPs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.researchprotocols.org/2024/1/e50568/authors .

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free