Evidence Hub

Rates of Nodal Upstaging following Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound Lymph Node Staging in Non-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

John Zhu, Matthew Bricknell, J. M. Watson, Tracy L. Leong, Daniel Steinfort

Respiration, 2026

5,161 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate hilar and mediastinal staging is critical for prognosis and treatment selection in non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While current guidelines recommend systematic mediastinal lymph node staging by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for early-stage disease, its utility in wider populations is increasingly recognized. We aimed to determine the rate of nodal upstaging following systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging in non-metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to February 2025. We included prospective and retrospective studies of adults with curative-intent NSCLC undergoing systematic EBUS-TBNA staging that reported per-patient nodal upstaging. Two reviewers independently extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis assessed the pooled proportion of PET-occult lymph node metastases. Upstaging rates were quantified across clinical N stages. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression assessed methodological variables (PROSPERO: CRD42024547873). RESULTS: Twenty-six studies comprising 5,161 participants were included. The pooled rate of PET-occult nodal metastases was 8.6% (95% CI: 6.7-11.0%), corresponding to a number needed to test of 12. Nodal upstaging rates varied by clinical stage: 7.2% for cN0, 10.6% for cN1, 5.0% for cN2, and 0.3% for cN3. Statistical heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 82.0%); however, subgroup analyses and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,161 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free