Evidence Hub

Digital Transformation in Healthcare Administration: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Telehealth on Administrative and Secretarial Roles

Khalid Abdulrahman Jamal Alanazi, Manal Abdulrahman Gamal Al Anazi, Salem Hammad Alanazi, Shuail Fahad Aldawsari, Alhanouf Abdullah Alarifi, Abdulaziz Mohammed Ali Alkathiri, Maged Mohammad Hussein ALtumaihi, Obaid Salman Tamim ALDOSSARY et al.

Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 2025

Abstract

Background: The rapid growth of telehealth has transformed clinical service delivery, but its deep implications for health care's administrative core have gone largely unexamined. Administrative and secretarial staff are essential in the coordination of virtual care, though their role is being reshaped by changing responsibilities, workflow interruptions, and new skill requirements. Aim: The review aims to conduct a systematic inquiry into how telehealth technologies influence the roles, challenges, and competency needs of administrative and secretarial staff in healthcare. Methods: A systematic search was carried out through PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Business Source Complete, and Web of Science for literature within the period of 2013-2025. Included were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results: With telehealth integration, the transformed administrative role encompasses much more complex digital care coordination, patient technology education, and virtual clinic management than traditional scheduling and filing. The integration of telehealth introduced such issues as new digital literacy demands on administration, fragmentation of workflows, and new responsibilities for patient education. Importantly, the "digital front door" to healthcare placed administrative staff at a critical position in the facilitation of equitable access and simultaneously exposed them to new stressors. Conclusion: The administration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free