Evidence Hub

Comparative Efficacy of Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptives in the Management of Adolescent Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Aqsa Mandvia, Rebecca George, Komal Kumari, Katee Kumari, Leen I Sabbagh, Amritveer Bhullar, Danyah Mohamed Ismail, Nikhil Deep Kolanu et al.

Cureus, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

This systematic review explores the comparative efficacy of metformin, combined oral contraceptives (COCs), and their combination in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) among adolescent females. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, yielding 645 records, of which seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied in design, population size, and outcome focus but consistently evaluated metabolic, hormonal, and reproductive endpoints. Results indicated that, while COCs were effective in reducing hyperandrogenic symptoms and regulating menstrual cycles, they were often associated with adverse metabolic effects, such as increased hepatic enzymes and insulin resistance. In contrast, insulin-sensitizing agents, particularly in combination regimens such as SPIOMET (spironolactone, pioglitazone, and metformin combination), showed superior outcomes in improving ovulation rates, insulin sensitivity, and body composition, with fewer metabolic side effects. Combination therapy with metformin and COCs also demonstrated a balanced improvement in both reproductive and metabolic profiles. The overall quality of included studies was rated as having some concerns due to variability in study design and reporting. Despite these limitations, the evidence supports a more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free