Evidence Hub

Early effects of metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Eisenhardt S, Schwarzmann N, Henschel V, Germeyer A, von Wolff M, Hamann A, Strowitzki T

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2006

23 participants · 129 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: Metformin is successfully used in the treatment of cycle disorders and anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). No data of the exact point and the impact of insulin resistance (IR) on metformin's efficacy exist.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the early potential effects of metformin treatment, their time of onset, and the role of IR on metformin's efficacy.

DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

PATIENTS: The patient population was 45 oligo-/anovulatory PCOS women with typical ovaries.

INTERVENTIONS: Women were stratified for IR (32 of 13) and then randomly allocated to receive either metformin (n = 22) or placebo (n = 23) and were assessed before and every 4 wk within a treatment period of 12 wk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Menstrual disturbance and markers of insulin metabolism were measured.

RESULTS: The main outcome criterion menstrual disturbance was successfully improved in the metformin-treated group, depending on IR (12 of 15 vs. three of 17), whereas women without IR (four of seven vs. four of six) had no significant amelioration of their menstrual irregularities (P < 0.05). Estradiol levels increased continuously only in the treatment group (P < 0.005), indicating an improvement of ovulatory function. Sixty-seven percent of metformin-treated women had at least one ovulation, compared with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free