Evidence Hub

Precision Medicine to Redefine Insulin Secretion and Monogenic Diabetes (PRISM): A Randomized Controlled Trial in Chinese Patients With Young-Onset Diabetes

Luk AOY, O CK, Fan B, Lau ESH, Fan Y, Lim C, Lui JNM, Wong KTC et al.

Diabetes care, 2026

699 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective: Young-onset type 2 diabetes (YOD) results from complex causes, calling for precision management.

Research design and methods: The Precision Medicine to Redefine Insulin Secretion and Monogenic Diabetes (PRISM) study was a single-center, two-arm, 3-year randomized controlled trial in which Chinese individuals aged 18 to 50 years with non-type 1 diabetes diagnosed at age ≤40 years were randomly assigned to intervention (Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation [JADE]-PRISM) or usual clinic-based care (JADE only). The intervention included technologically guided assessment and use of biogenetic markers (autoantibodies, C-peptide, and common and rare genetic variants) to classify diabetes for 1-year intensified, algorithm-based treatment followed by two annual reviews by an endocrinologist-led multidisciplinary team. The primary end point was a composite of incident or progression of all diabetes-related complications. Secondary end points included attainment of three or more treatment targets (HbA1c <6.2%, blood pressure <120/75 mmHg, LDL cholesterol <1.2 mmol/L, triglycerides <1.2 mmol/L, and waist circumference <80 [women] or <85 cm [men]), proxies of β-cell function, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Results: During 2020 to 2021, 884 participants (mean [SD] age 40.7 [6.5] years; mean [SD] age at diagnosis 32.5 [6.8] years; autoantibody positivity [n = 46]; monogenic diabetes [n = 23]; C-peptide <200 pmol/L [n = 82]; central obesity [n = 699]; dyslipidemia [n =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 699 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free