Evidence Hub

Adding L-carnitine to antagonist ovarian stimulation doesn't improve the outcomes of IVF/ ICSI cycle in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

Hafezi M, Arabipoor A, Ghaffari F, Vesali S, Zareei M, Hessari ZH

Journal of ovarian research, 2024

110 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of L-carnitine supplementation during the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle with antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) diagnosis undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.

Methods and materials: This was a double-blind clinical trial study including 110 patients with PCOS attended to Royan Institute between March 2020 and February 2023. At the beginning of the COS cycle, the eligible patients were allocated into two groups randomly according to the coding list of the drugs prepared by the statistical consultant. In the experimental group, patients received 3 tablets daily (L-carnitine 1000 mg) from the second day of menstruation of the previous cycle until the puncture day in the cases of freeze-all embryos (6 weeks) or until the day of the pregnancy test (8 weeks) in fresh embryo transfer cycle. In the control group, patients received 3 placebo tablets for the same period of time. Weight assessment and fasting blood sugar and insulin tests, as well as serum lipid profile were also measured at the baseline and ovum pick-up day. The results of the COS cycle as well as the implantation and pregnancy rates were compared between groups.

Results: Finally, 45 cases in L-carnitine group versus 47 cases in the placebo group were completed study per protocol. Data analysis showed that the two groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic characteristics and baseline laboratory tests and severity of PCOS. There is no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free