Evidence Hub

The Efficacy and Safety of DLBS3233, A Combined Bioactive Fraction of Cinnamomum burmanii and Lagerstroemia speciosa Plants on The Endocrine-Metabolic Profile of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A. Hestiantoro, Permadi Wiryawan, R. Tjandrawinata, Budi Wiweko, M. Ritonga, Ade Indra Ferrina, K. Sumapraja, R. Muharam et al.

International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 2024

124 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: A bioactive fraction of Cinnamomum burmanii and Lagerstroemia speciosa, DLBS3233, has recently been used for type-2-diabetes treatment due to its favorable effect on insulin sensitivity. The insulin resistance leading to metabolic syndrome is closely linked to hyperandrogenemia in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). This study evaluated the metabolic and reproductive efficacy and safety of DLBS3233 in insulin-resistant PCOS women. Materials and Methods: This was a 2-arm, randomized, double-blind, controlled, noninferiority clinical study over a 6-month therapy with DLBS3233 100-mg daily in comparison to metformin-XR 750 mg twice daily, involving 124 PCOS women with insulin resistance. The primary efficacy endpoint was the improvement of Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary endpoints were improvements in other metabolic and reproductive parameters. Safety endpoints were based on blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiogram findings, liver and renal function, and adverse events. Results: After 6 months, HOMA-IR improvement in DLBS3233-treated group (-1.03 ± 0.50) and metformin-XR (-1.19 ± 0.50) were comparable, with a between-group difference fell within the pre-set non-inferiority margin (0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.24, 1.56; P=0.3168). The HOMA-IR in both groups were significantly improved from baseline. On all secondary endpoints, both groups showed comparable effects. Markedly fewer adverse events occurred in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free