Evidence Hub

Metabolic syndrome in youth with bipolar spectrum disorders treated with second-generation antipsychotics: baseline results from the community-based pragmatic MOBILITY Trial

Higdon C, Welge JA, Crimmins NA, Klein CC, Fornari VM, Sorter MT, Blom TJ, Kurtz BP et al.

European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025

1,565 participants

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) in obese youth in the general population is about 29%. The aim of this study is to identify the baseline prevalence and clinical characteristics of MetS in a sample of overweight/obese youth with bipolar spectrum disorders treated with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). The MOBILITY trial enrolled overweight/obese youth 8-19 years of age with a lifetime diagnosis of a bipolar spectrum disorder who were continuing or starting treatment with an SGA (November/2015-December/2022). Baseline height, weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, fasting lipid profile, glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and insulin were collected. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of MetS and each of its component criteria and correlations with demographic factors. Of 1565 randomized patients mean age = 13.9 ± 2.8 years, males = 53%, White = 65.4%, Black/African American = 18.5%, multiracial = 9.6%, obese = 65.7%, overweight = 34.3%, MetS status could be determined for 996 patients (63.6%). The overall prevalence of MetS was 32.8% (males = 49.5%, females = 26.0%, p < 0.001), being higher in obese than overweight youth (41.1% vs 4.1%, p < 0.001). The odds of MetS increased rapidly with age in boys (p < 0.001); no association with age was evident among girls. White patients having significantly higher frequency of MetS than Black/African American patients (35.5% vs 24.9%, OR = 1.75, p = 0.003). The prevalence of MetS in this enriched sample was about one-third…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,565 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free