Evidence Hub

Predictors of participant retention in infertility treatment trials

Kuang H, Jin S, Thomas T, Engmann L, Hansen KR, Coutifaris C, Casson P, Christman G et al.

Fertility and sterility, 2015

9 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables associated with retention (or dropout) in infertility clinical trials. Retention of subjects in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) has received considerable attention, but there have been few consistent findings.

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from RCTs.

SETTING: Academic medical centers.

PATIENT(S): Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or couples with unexplained infertility, aged 18-40 years.

INTERVENTION(S): This study is not an intervention study, but the patients in the original RCTs were treated with any or combination of metformin, clomiphene citrate (CC), letrozole, and gonadotropins.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Successful retention versus dropout during the RCTs.

RESULT(S): Race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), insurance coverage, history of smoking, and history of alcohol use were significantly associated with retention whether they were considered in bivariate analyses or a multivariable logistic model. Specifically, white race, higher income, having graduate degrees, normal weight, better insurance coverage, nonsmokers, and those who reported current use of alcohol at the start of the trial, had higher retention rates.

CONCLUSION(S): We identified several additive and persistent predictors of retention that can be used to guide the conduct of RCTs and improve the retention rate. Given the limitation of our association analysis, methodologically sound and theoretically grounded research are warranted so that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free