Evidence Hub

Data-Driven Phenotypic Clusters of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Associations With Risk of Perinatal Complications and Postpartum Diabetes

Zhu Y, Ngo AL, Liao LD, Harvill R, Marafino BJ, Chehab RF, Greenberg MB, Ferrara A

Diabetes care, 2026

37,544 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective: Management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) largely follows a uniform approach, despite growing recognition of GDM heterogeneity. We aimed to identify data-driven GDM clusters by using machine learning techniques and clinical data and to assess their associations with perinatal complications and postpartum diabetes risk.

Research design and methods: In a population-based cohort study, 37,544 individuals with GDM were followed up through 12 years postpartum. In the discovery (70%) and validation (30%) sets, we applied dimension reduction and clustering methods using routinely available sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical variables. Covariate-adjusted modified Poisson and Cox regression models were used to assess associations of GDM clusters with risk of perinatal complications and postpartum diabetes.

Results: Four data-driven GDM phenotypic clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (C1) (65.6%), C2 (14.5%), C3 (12.0%), and C4 (7.8%) comprised the discovery set, with similar distributions in the validation set (C1-C4 66.7%, 14.0%, 12.0%, 7.4%, respectively). C2-C4 compared with C1 (late-diagnosed, lower-BMI, and postload hyperglycemia GDM) were associated with higher risks of perinatal complications and new-onset postpartum diabetes, especially C4 (early-diagnosed, comorbidity-related, and high-glucose challenge test GDM) (adjusted relative risks: severe maternal morbidity 1.43 [95% CI 1.19, 1.72] and neonatal intensive unit admission 1.53 [1.41, 1.66];…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 37,544 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free