Evidence Hub

Continuing Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Into the First Trimester of Pregnancy and Pregnancy Outcomes : A Target Trial Emulation Study Using Claims Information

Brown JP, Huybrechts KF, Straub L, Patorno E, Seely EW, Bateman BT, Hernández-Díaz S

Annals of internal medicine, 2026

1,467 participants

Abstract

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use has increased among women of reproductive age, but limited data exist on safety in pregnancy.

Objective: To estimate the risk for nonlive birth, abnormal fetal growth, and major congenital malformation (MCM) with GLP-1RA dispensing in early pregnancy.

Design: In an observational cohort of pregnant women aged 16 to 55 years with a GLP-1RA dispensation in the 90 days before the last menstrual period (LMP), a target trial with 2 treatment strategies was emulated: continuation of dispensing into the first trimester (≥1 further dispensation), or noncontinuation.

Setting: Merative MarketScan U.S. insurance claims data (2011 to 2024).

Participants: 3572 pregnancies (41.1% [n = 1467] among women with type 2 diabetes).

Measurements: Risk for nonlive birth was estimated using a weighted Kaplan-Meier estimator. Among live-birth pregnancies linked to infants, the weighted prevalence of MCM, small for gestational age (SGA), and large for gestational age (LGA) was estimated.

Results: The weighted risk for nonlive birth was 29.7% with continuation and 27.1% with noncontinuation (adjusted risk ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.23]). Among 2529 live-birth pregnancies, 1443 (57.1%) received at least 1 GLP-1RA dispensation after LMP and 1499 (829 continuers) were linked to an infant. Weighted prevalence ratios for continuation versus noncontinuation were 1.29 (CI, 0.82 to 2.06) for SGA, 1.08 (CI, 0.84 to 1.40) for LGA, and 1.21…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,467 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free