Evidence Hub

Trends, in Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome by Specialty

Uliassi N, Sullivan S, Damle L, Gomez-Lobo V

The Journal of reproductive medicine, 2016

84 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.

STUDY DESIGN: Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.

RESULTS: Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.

CONCLUSION: Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free