Evidence Hub

Trends in standard workup performed by pediatric subspecialists for the diagnosis of adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome

Powers SE, Uliassi NW, Sullivan SD, Tuchman LK, Mehra R, Gomez-Lobo V

Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 2015

261 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify trends in the clinical workup, diagnosis, and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome by pediatric endocrinologists, pediatric gynecologists, and adolescent medicine specialists.

DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.

SETTING: Tertiary care medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Females aged 11-18 y who were evaluated for PCOS from June 2009 to October 2011 were included. Any patients with coexisting diagnoses of other primary etiology for amenorrhea were excluded. Patients were identified by ICD-9 codes for PCOS, hypersecretion of ovarian androgens, irregular menses, hirsutism, oligomenorrhea, or amenorrhea. 261 patients were included: 144 from endocrinology, 9 from gynecology, and 108 from adolescent pediatric practices.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the androgen labs ordered by the subspecialties. Gynecologists ordered pelvic ultrasonography for 89% (n = 8) of patients, compared to 9% (n = 10) by adolescent medicine specialists and 24% (n = 34) by endocrinologists (P < .0001). Endocrinologists were most likely to treat patients who met diagnostic criteria for PCOS with metformin (58%, n = 66), compared to gynecologists (14%, n = 1) and adolescent medicine specialists (5%, n = 3) (P < .0001). Gynecologists (43%, n = 3) and adolescent medicine specialists (58%, n = 39) were more likely than endocrinologists (24%, n = 27) to treat patients with oral contraceptive pills (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistent diagnosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free