Evidence Hub

Comparative analysis of the vaginal microbiome of healthy and polycystic ovary syndrome women: a large cross-sectional study

C. Jin, Lang Qin, Zheng Liu, Xiao Li, Xuan Gao, Yongzhi Cao, Shigang Zhao, Jiaojiao Wang et al.

Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 2023

1,446 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the different features of the vaginal microbiome (VMB) between patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and healthy women?

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a single academic university-affiliated centre. A total of 1446 participants were recruited (PCOS group, n =713, control group, n = 733). Vaginal swabs were analysed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The diversity and composition of the microbiome were compared between the PCOS group and the control group. Microbial interaction networks and functional prediction were investigated.

RESULTS

The PCOS group had a higher alpha diversity than the control group (Shannon P = 0.03, Simpson P = 0.02), and higher intra-group variability was observed in PCOS group (P < 2.2E-16). At the genus level, the proportion of Lactobacillus decreased (85.1% versus 89.3%, false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.02), whereas the proportion of Gardnerella vaginalis and Ureaplasma increased in the PCOS group (5.1% versus 3.3%, FDR = 0.006; 1.2% versus 0.6%, FDR = 0.002, respectively). Lactobacillus acidophilus, Prevotella buccalis and G. vaginalis were identified as the main differential species. L. acidophilus was positively correlated with serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and triglyceride (P = 2.01E-05, P = 0.004, respectively). P. buccalis was negatively correlated with serum levels of AMH and testosterone (P = 0.002, P = 0.003, respectively). G. vaginalis was positively correlated with serum…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,446 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free