Evidence Hub

Vitamin D and metabolic disturbances in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): A cross-sectional study

Y. Krul-Poel, P. Koenders, R. Steegers-Theunissen, E. ten Boekel, M. T. ter Wee, Y. Louwers, P. Lips, J. Laven et al.

PLoS ONE, 2018

639 participants · 71 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare vitamin D status in women with PCOS versus fertile women and subsequently evaluate the association between vitamin D status and metabolic disturbances in PCOS women. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional comparison study of 639 women with PCOS and 449 fertile women. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was stratified into a severe deficient ( 75 nmol/l) status. The main outcome measures were the difference in vitamin D status between PCOS and fertile women, and the association between serum 25(OH)D and metabolic disturbances in PCOS women only. Results Serum 25(OH)D was significantly lower in PCOS women compared to fertile controls (mean 25(OH)D of 49.0 nmol/l versus 64.5 nmol/l). An adjusted significant difference was seen between serum 25(OH)D and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) (β = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63–0.91; p < 0.01), HDL-cholesterol (β = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05–0.60, p < 0.01) and apolipoprotein A1 (β = 26.2; 95% CI: 7.5–45.0, p < 0.01) between the highest vitamin D group compared to the lowest vitamin D group. Conclusions This study demonstrates that women with PCOS have a significantly lower serum 25(OH)D compared to fertile controls. A compromised vitamin D status in PCOS women is associated with a higher HOMA-IR and an unfavourable lipid profile. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary to explore the causality of this linkage.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 639 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free