Evidence Hub

Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia due to pathogenic INSR variants: metabolic signature, phenotypic overlap, and semidominant inheritance

Marcelino do Nascimento R, Dos Santos A, Guadagnini D, de Santana LS, Santomauro ACJ, Gouveia Buff Passone C, Gurgel Teles Bezerra M, Gomes LG et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

Abstract

Objective: Familial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia type 5 (HHF5) and type A insulin resistance syndrome (TAIRS) are autosomal dominant disorders caused by heterozygous pathogenic variants in the insulin receptor gene (INSR), whereas Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome (RMS) and Donohue syndrome (DS) result from recessive inheritance. We aimed to characterize the metabolic, phenotypic, and genotypic spectrum of individuals with PGV-INSR presenting with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH) and insulin resistance (IR).

Methods: Normal-weight probands with HH and IR underwent exome sequencing with familial segregation confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Metabolic evaluation included prolonged fasting, mixed-meal, and oral glucose tolerance tests. A published insulinoma cohort served as a comparator.

Results: Five unrelated families (F1-F5) harbored four heterozygous and one homozygous PGV-INSR. Eighteen carriers were identified. HH occurred in 78% (18/23), predominantly postprandial, whereas 22% had diabetes; IR was present in all carriers and 60% of women had PCOS. Marked intrafamilial variability and phenotypic overlap among HHF5, TAIRS, and RMS were observed, including the coexistence of dominant and recessive inheritance within one family. A distinct metabolic signature was identified, characterized by normal BMI, variable degrees of IR (with or without acanthosis), inappropriately elevated fasting and stimulated insulin concentrations, normal triglycerides, and predominantly postprandial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free