Evidence Hub

Unintentional periconceptional exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A nationwide cohort study in Taiwan

Chou YC, Weng SH, Cheng FS, Tseng CH, Hu HY, Liu CH

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

7 citations

Abstract

Aims: To assess whether periconceptional exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) is associated with adverse outcomes in women with pregestational type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods: We linked Taiwan's Birth Certificate Application and National Health Insurance claims (2013-2022) to assemble a nationwide cohort of singleton births to mothers (18-50 years) with pregestational diabetes. Exposure was any GLP-1 RA dispensed during the 90 days before and after the last menstrual period; insulin without GLP-1 RA was the active comparator. Outcomes were major congenital malformations, stillbirth, preterm birth (<37 weeks) and small for gestational age (SGA, <10th percentile). We used 1:4 propensity-score matching and Poisson generalised estimating equation (GEE); sensitivity analyses required ≥2 prescriptions and restricted exposure to the first trimester.

Results: We identified 3351 comparison pregnancies (GLP-1 RA 160; insulin 3191); matching yielded 160 versus 606. Risk ratios (GLP-1 RA vs. insulin) were malformations 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.11-3.83), stillbirth 2.05 (0.82-5.13), preterm birth 1.09 (0.85-1.39) and SGA 0.86 (0.31-2.41). Sensitivity analyses were similar.

Conclusions: Periconceptional GLP-1 RA exposure was not associated with increased risks of malformations, stillbirth, preterm birth or SGA versus insulin use. These preliminary data require confirmation in larger agent-specific studies; until then, intentional GLP-1 RA use in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free