Evidence Hub

The impact of vitamin D supplementation on anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mirzaei P, Eslamian G, Sohouli MH, Tadayoni ZS

BMC endocrine disorders, 2025

484 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The possible anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)-reduction impact of vitamin D supplementation has been assessed in a number of interventional investigations. The outcomes are still incongruous, however. This research sought to thoroughly examine the effects of vitamin D supplementation on AMH in order to have a better understanding of them.

Methods: Using standard keywords, the Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched to find all controlled trials examining the levels of AMH after vitamin D treatment. For the best result estimate, random-effects model analysis produced 95% confidence intervals and a pooled weighted mean difference.

Results: This article includes sixteen research with a total of 484 participants. Vitamin D supplementation did not significantly affect AMH levels in single-arm (pooled WMD of -0.22 ng/ml; 95% CI -0.68 to 0.23; P = 0.333) or randomized clinical trial (pooled WMD of -0.07 ng/ml; 95% CI -1.01 to 0.87; P = 0.887) studies, according to pooled results from the random-effects model. Vitamin D during the intervention < 8 weeks and in individuals with low baseline levels of vitamin D serum induces a higher drop in AMH levels, according to the findings of subgroup analysis.

Conclusions: Despite the inconclusive and conflicting evidence on the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and AMH levels in women, it is evident that vitamin D may play a role in mitigating the negative impact of AMH on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 484 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free